首頁資訊作為藝術(shù)行動(dòng)的美——一種生活美學(xué)的視角

作為藝術(shù)行動(dòng)的美——一種生活美學(xué)的視角

來源：泰然健康網(wǎng) 時(shí)間：2025年09月01日 16:34

關(guān)于美學(xué)學(xué)科的合法性，目前學(xué)界有兩種意見。取消主義美學(xué)認(rèn)為“美”是一個(gè)先行設(shè)定出來的“超級(jí)概念”，沒有一個(gè)“超級(jí)事實(shí)”與其對應(yīng)，犯了形而上學(xué)本質(zhì)主義的錯(cuò)誤，因此美學(xué)學(xué)科并不合法；形而上學(xué)美學(xué)則堅(jiān)持形而上學(xué)的陣地，用康德美學(xué)的“合目的性”來解釋美這個(gè)概念，由此認(rèn)為美學(xué)學(xué)科具有合乎理想價(jià)值的合法性。本文以為，由于形而上學(xué)美學(xué)的理論自閉性，不可能讓審美活動(dòng)具有現(xiàn)實(shí)的超越性價(jià)值；而取消主義美學(xué)最大的問題是在正確指出“超級(jí)概念”虛妄性的同時(shí)，沒有充分估計(jì)到其中包含的目的性價(jià)值。當(dāng)然，上述兩種意見并非沒有融通之處，即將美理解為某種藝術(shù)行動(dòng)，不過本文認(rèn)為，這種藝術(shù)行動(dòng)不僅是超越性的，而且應(yīng)該攜帶日常生活這幅肉身。

Abstract

There are two ideas about the legitimacy of aesthetics as a discipline. Aesthetics of Elimination claims that beauty is an a prior super-concept which, absent of a corresponding super-reality, falls into the abyss of metaphysical essentialism. Hence, aesthetics is not a legitimate discipline. Metaphysical Aesthetics holds that beauty should be interpreted through Kantian purposiveness of aesthetics and claims the legitimacy of the discipline of aesthetics in its ideal-confirming value. This paper argues that metaphysical aesthetics, due to its theoretically self-enclosed nature, cannot allow aesthetic activities to take on realistic transcendent value. Aesthetics of Elimination, however, has its own major problem. While it correctly points out the illusionary nature of super-concept, it has failed to fully acknowledge its value of purposiveness. Between the two ideas in question, there is certainly a common ground, which is to take beauty as an action of art. This action, this paper concludes, not only contains transcendent value but also carries with it the mortal body of everyday life.

關(guān)鍵詞

藝術(shù)行動(dòng) / 生活美學(xué) / 超越性 / 肉身{{custom_keyword}} /

Key words

action of art /aesthetics of life /transcendence /mortal body{{custom_keyword}} /

張寶貴.

0" m-for-array="{{authorList_cn}}" m-for-val="custom_author" m-for-index="custom_index">0">, {{custom_author.name_cn}}等.

作為藝術(shù)行動(dòng)的美——一種生活美學(xué)的視角[J]. 文藝?yán)碚撗芯? 2014, 34(3): 57-63

ZHANG Bao-Gui.

0" m-for-array="{{authorList_en}}" m-for-val="custom_author" m-for-index="custom_index">0">, {{custom_author.name_en}}et al.

Beauty as an Action of Art: from the Aspect of Aesthetics of Life[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(3): 57-63

參考文獻(xiàn)

亞里士多德：《詩學(xué)》，陳中梅譯。北京：商務(wù)印書館，2002年。
[Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. Chen Zhongmei. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2002.]
Bacon, Francis. Advancement of Learning and the New Atlantis. London New York and Toronto : Oxford University Press, 1951.
- - -. The New Organon. Ed. Lisa Jardine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
鄧曉芒：《冥河的擺渡者》。昆明：云南人民出版社，1997年。
[Deng, Xiaomang. The Ferryman on Styx. Kunming: Yunnan Renmin Publishing House, 1997.]
Dewey, John. Art as Experience. New York: Minton Balch & Company, 1934.
- - -. Experience and Nature. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company,1994.
劉旭光：“保衛(wèi)美，保衛(wèi)美學(xué)”，《文藝爭鳴》 11（2012）：6-11。
[Liu, Xuguang. “Defending Beauty, Defending Aesthetics.” Forum on Literature and Art 4 (2012): 6-11.]
魯迅：“文藝與革命”，《語絲》 16（1928）：41-43。
[Lu, Xun. “Literature, Art and Revolution.” Yusi 16 (1928): 41-43.]
馬克思：“關(guān)于費(fèi)爾巴哈的提綱”，《馬克思恩格斯文集》第一卷。北京：人民出版社，2009年。
[Marx, Karl. “Theses on Feuerbach.” Collected Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Vol. 1. Beijing: Renmin Publishing House, 2009.]
柏拉圖：《柏拉圖文藝對話錄》，朱光潛譯。北京：人民文學(xué)出版社，1963年。
[Plato. The Dialogues on Literature and Art. Trans. Zhu Guangqian. Beijing: Renmin Literature Publishing House, 1963.]
Quine, W. V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.
索緒爾：《普通語言學(xué)教程》，高名凱譯。北京：商務(wù)印書館，1999年。
[Saussure. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Gao Mingkai. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1999.]
Tatarkiewicz, Wladyslaw. A History of Six Ideas: an Essay in Aesthetics. Polish: Scientific Publishers Warszawa, 1980.
Adorno,Theodor, W. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. London and New York: Continuum, 2002.
王峰：“美學(xué)是一門錯(cuò)誤的學(xué)科”，《清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》 4（2009）：81-89。
[Wang, Feng.“Aesthetics is a False Subject.” Journal of Tsinghua University 4 (2009): 81-89.]
——：“美：一個(gè)被毀棄的盟約”，《文藝爭鳴》 11（2012）：12-17。
[- - -. “Beauty: an Alliance Destroyed.” Forum on Literature and Art 11 (2012): 12-17.]
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.
----. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E.M. Anscombe. Basil: Blackwell Ltd, 1986.
維特根斯坦：《邏輯哲學(xué)論》，郭英譯。北京：商務(wù)印書館，1992年。
[Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logical-Philosophicus. Trans. Guo Yin. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1992. ]